<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dawkins Part 1: Straw Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toddhdow.org/2007/09/11/dawkins-part-1-straw-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toddhdow.org/2007/09/11/dawkins-part-1-straw-men/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, opinions and various writings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:09:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://toddhdow.org/2007/09/11/dawkins-part-1-straw-men/#comment-1812</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddhdow.org/2007/09/11/dawkins-part-1-straw-men/#comment-1812</guid>
		<description>I hate to break it to you but you calling Dawkin&#039;s logic flawed is flawed. You claim that Free Will undoes the burden of God&#039;s intervention, however if God is omniscient, he knows what we do, creating a locked chain of events which is the opposite of Free Will.
Free Will and Omniscience cannot logically exist together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to break it to you but you calling Dawkin&#8217;s logic flawed is flawed. You claim that Free Will undoes the burden of God&#8217;s intervention, however if God is omniscient, he knows what we do, creating a locked chain of events which is the opposite of Free Will.<br />
Free Will and Omniscience cannot logically exist together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Archibald</title>
		<link>http://toddhdow.org/2007/09/11/dawkins-part-1-straw-men/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Archibald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddhdow.org/2007/09/11/dawkins-part-1-straw-men/#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Look forward to the rest of this series!
Kev</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look forward to the rest of this series!<br />
Kev</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Cefai</title>
		<link>http://toddhdow.org/2007/09/11/dawkins-part-1-straw-men/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Cefai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddhdow.org/2007/09/11/dawkins-part-1-straw-men/#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, not a lot of comments on this one?  Seemed like a lot of theoritical debate on this one that didn&#039;t really compell me one way or another.   The only comment I have is around the inconsistencies of the bible.  My only point here are the folks out there that believe in the &#039;literal&#039; meaning of the bible, which baffles me...as if God himself wrote the bible.  Other than that not much to comment on this one...

D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, not a lot of comments on this one?  Seemed like a lot of theoritical debate on this one that didn&#8217;t really compell me one way or another.   The only comment I have is around the inconsistencies of the bible.  My only point here are the folks out there that believe in the &#8216;literal&#8217; meaning of the bible, which baffles me&#8230;as if God himself wrote the bible.  Other than that not much to comment on this one&#8230;</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
